Transitioning
from the Article to Your Topic
After
you have identified your topic, figure out if you are going to: Agree; Disagree; address a Missed Idea; present
a Solution; provide Analysis; or discuss a New, Related Idea
Rule:
Never mention yourself or the experience of reading the article.
Agree:
Identify the idea you agree with as the most interesting idea in the
article. Then, explain it.
Disagree:
Identify the idea as the most questionable part of the article. Then, explain it.
Missing
Idea: Bring up the idea as something that should have been taken into account
& explain it.
Solution:
Isolate the problem and explain it;
then, your thesis can suggest that there is a solution (the best, of course) to
this problem.
Analysis:
Let the reader know that you will be looking at the various techniques and
devices used by the writer and evaluating their effectiveness.
New,
Related Idea: If you would like to
address an idea that reading the article made you think about, identify it as a
related idea and suggest that it, too,
merits consideration. Explain it.
Transitional ¶ Example: New, Related Idea
Paglia discusses how this body image epidemic is
beginning to affect men the way it has affected women for decades. The percentage of men who develop eating
disorders has risen. Furthermore, more
men feel the pressure to “compulsively exercise,” often devoting hours each day
to muscular development. Another effect
of the expectation of physical perfection is that men often seek out
substances, many of them very unhealthy, in order to
minimize the time it takes for them to see results. In essence, the objectification of men may
soon be on par with the objectification of women—with similar results. However, because this situation is still at
the inception stage, there is time to address it before it gets out of
hand. The most egregious offender, more
even than Hollywood, is the advertizing industry. Thus, this is the first group that needs to
undergo or undertake reformation. The
advertizing industry must be brought to task for the effects that their
campaigns are having on our twenty-something men before the situation reaches
the severity that it has reached with young women.
Transitional
¶ Example: Disagree
While
Richie is correct about the need for a male-female rape dialogue, her claim
that all men are biologically predisposed to be rapists is a huge
generalization. Essentially, she states
as fact the questionable assertion that all men are biologically driven to rape,
that it is an “inherent” desire. She
offers no support for this, making a blanket accusation of all men based on the
actions of a small percentage of the population. Indeed, there is nothing to suggest that the
desire to rape is anything more than an individual tendency, not an inherent
male one.